| ID | Date | Team A | Team B | Tournament | Phase | Result | Opponent | F | A | Diff | Sum | Regis B | Opponent | ES Regis B | Adjustment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15830 | Oct 10 2009 | Thorsten B | 3 | 5 | Regis B | Lund II | - | Win | Thorsten B | 5 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 1600 | 1648 | 43.2% | +18.2 |
| 15828 | Oct 10 2009 | Dagh N | 9 | 2 | Regis B | Lund II | - | Loss | Dagh N | 2 | 9 | -7 | 11 | 1600 | 2314 | 1.6% | -0.5 |
| 15826 | Oct 10 2009 | Jacob K | 5 | 2 | Regis B | Lund II | - | Loss | Jacob K | 2 | 5 | -3 | 7 | 1600 | 1817 | 22.2% | -7.1 |
| 15823 | Oct 10 2009 | Regis B | 2 | 5 | Volker B | Lund II | - | Loss | Volker B | 2 | 5 | -3 | 7 | 1600 | 1749 | 29.8% | -9.5 |
| 15819 | Oct 10 2009 | Regis B | 4 | 4 | Torgny A | Lund II | - | - | Torgny A | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 1600 | 1638 | 44.6% | +1.7 |
| 15815 | Oct 10 2009 | Regis B | 2 | 6 | John H | Lund II | - | Loss | John H | 2 | 6 | -4 | 8 | 1600 | 1992 | 9.5% | -3.0 |
| 15809 | Oct 10 2009 | Regis B | 4 | 0 | Thorsten B | Lund II | - | Win | Thorsten B | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1600 | 1648 | 43.2% | +18.2 |
| 15807 | Oct 10 2009 | Regis B | 3 | 10 | Dagh N | Lund II | - | Loss | Dagh N | 3 | 10 | -7 | 13 | 1600 | 2314 | 1.6% | -0.5 |
| 15805 | Oct 10 2009 | Regis B | 2 | 3 | Jacob K | Lund II | - | Loss | Jacob K | 2 | 3 | -1 | 5 | 1600 | 1817 | 22.2% | -7.1 |
| 15802 | Oct 10 2009 | Volker B | 5 | 3 | Regis B | Lund II | - | Loss | Volker B | 3 | 5 | -2 | 8 | 1600 | 1749 | 29.8% | -9.5 |
| 15798 | Oct 10 2009 | Torgny A | 1 | 2 | Regis B | Lund II | - | Win | Torgny A | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1600 | 1638 | 44.6% | +17.7 |
| 15794 | Oct 10 2009 | John H | 7 | 3 | Regis B | Lund II | - | Loss | John H | 3 | 7 | -4 | 10 | 1600 | 1992 | 9.5% | -3.0 |